AGM Re-execution (AGM-rE)

Post-event reuse of action-governing meaning

1. Canonical Definition

AGM Re-execution (AGM-rE) is the post-event reuse of a previously bound action-governing meaning, in which the meaning is treated as already settled and continues to constrain response routing without reactivation of interpretive jurisdiction.

2. Phase and Preconditions

Operates: post-event (cross-event, non-interpretive)

Requires:

• a completed interpretive event

• a prior binding producing action-governing meaning

• event closure

• determinacy conditions sufficient for routing without reinterpretation

Does not require:

• crystallization

• legitimacy or authority

• correctness or validity of the bound meaning

• conscious recall or narrative access

• persistence guarantees across time

3. Scope and Exclusions

AGM Re-execution is not:

• interpretation or reinterpretation

• a memory retrieval process

• a habit, reflex, or motor routine without meaning governance

• a persistence guarantee or stabilization mechanism

• a form of crystallization or meaning regime

• a reactivation condition or failure threshold

4. Structural Role

AGM Re-execution specifies how action-governing meaning continues to function after an interpretive event has closed. It describes the reuse of an already bound meaning to constrain response routing across subsequent system states without reopening interpretive competition.

AGM Re-execution is the normal operating mode of meaning-governed systems between interpretive events. When AGM Re-execution remains viable, interpretation does not re-engage. When AGM Re-execution can no longer deterministically constrain routing, Action Determinacy Loss occurs.

5. Relationship to Routing and Determinacy

AGM Re-execution constrains response routing, but does not define routing mechanisms.

AGM Re-execution presupposes determinacy conditions. It remains operative only while determinacy conditions are satisfied. Failure of determinacy conditions does not modify AGM Re-execution; it terminates its viability and necessitates interpretive reactivation.

6. Authority and Legitimacy Status

Authority relation: neutral
Legitimacy relation: not applicable

AGM Re-execution does not assign, evaluate, or revoke authority. It does not assess legitimacy or justification. It describes operational reuse, not normative standing.

7. Temporal Status

AGM Re-execution is post-event but not inherently temporal. It does not specify duration, stability, or rate of decay. It may persist briefly or indefinitely depending on whether determinacy conditions continue to hold.

AGM Re-execution may occur repeatedly across time without implying crystallization.

8. Common Category Errors

• Treating AGM Re-execution as interpretation or implicit deliberation

• Treating it as memory replay or narrative processing

• Treating it as habit, instinct, or reflex without prior binding

• Treating it as a persistence guarantee or meaning regime

• Treating it as a trigger or subtype of Action Determinacy Loss

9. Canonical Cross-References

Interpretation • Interpretive Jurisdiction • Binding • Action-Governing Meaning (AGM) • Response Routing • Event Closure State • Determinacy Conditions • Action Determinacy Loss (ADL) • Meaning Regimes (PCMR / DMR)

10. Plain Statement

AGM Re-execution describes how meaning continues to govern action after a decision has already been made.