The Transformation Management Institute™
Research Library
About the Library
The Research Library is the official home of the Transformation Management Institute’s scientific publications. It includes the foundational work that defines Meaning System Science and its emergence as the General Theory of Interpretation, along with the applied research, governance models, and professional standards that extend the science into real-world practice.
The Canon of Meaning System Science
A clear map of the entire field: its foundations, structure, and core publications. Start here for an overview of how Meaning System Science is organized and how each series fits together.
El Lissitzky, Proun 19D, 1922. © Artists Rights Society (ARS).
Featured with Artificial Intelligence as a Meaning System as a metaphor for multidimensional governance: forms rotating through conceptual space, demonstrating how meaning shifts when structural elements exceed the capacity of fixed interpretive frames.
Featured Governance: C Series
Artificial Intelligence as a Meaning System
Responding to the Crisis of Machine-Generated Meaning
November 2025
A landmark governance monograph that reframes AI as a meaning-making system and explains why machine-scale variation destabilizes cultural, institutional, and organizational environments. Introduces Meaning-System Governance and defines the proportional standards required to stabilize truth, signals, structure, drift, and affect as human and machine systems jointly produce meaning.
Hilma af Klint, The Swan (No. 17, Group IX/SU), 1915.
© The Hilma af Klint Foundation / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.
Featured with The Scientific Lineage of Meaning as a visual metaphor for converging lineages. Distinct forms meet in structured balance, mirroring how five scientific traditions resolve into the architecture of Meaning System Science.
Featured Foundations: A Series
The Scientific Lineage of Meaning
Traces the scientific lineage that made Meaning System Science possible. Through the lives and discoveries of Tarski, Saussure, Bertalanffy, Prigogine, and Barrett, this monograph shows how five independent breakthroughs revealed the structural conditions of interpretation and now form a unified scientific architecture.
Piet Mondrian, Composition with Red, Blue, and Yellow, 1930
© Mondrian/Holtzman Trust / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.
Featured with Meaning System Science as a visual metaphor for structural proportion: independent variables held in disciplined relation, coherence created through constrained geometry, and meaning emerging from the balanced interaction of truth, signal, and structure.
Monograph A2
Meaning System Science
October 2025
Meaning System Science establishes the General Theory of Interpretation. It defines how truth, signals, structure, drift, and regulation interact as one proportional system, making meaning a measurable and predictable scientific object.
The Charter of the Transformation Management Institute
Anila Quayyum Agha, Intersections, 2014.
© Anila Quayyum Agha. Courtesy of the artist.
Featured with The Emergence of Transformation Science as a visual metaphor for moral architecture: light disciplined by pattern, revealing how order makes truth visible.
Monograph B1
The Emergence of Transformation Science
October 2025
This paper tells the story of how the applied discipline of Transformation Science came into being. It explains why prior approaches like change management and culture work could not keep systems aligned, and how Meaning System Science made a new field possible. It’s the origin point of the discipline.
Refik Anadol, Machine Hallucinations – Nature, 2019.
© Refik Anadol. Courtesy of the artist and Refik Anadol Studio.
Featured with The Practice of Transformation Science as a visual metaphor for empirical design and measured intelligence: data composed into symmetry, order discovered within motion.
Monograph B2
The Practice of Transformation Science
October 2025
This paper defines Transformation Management as the applied discipline that existed long before the science. It shows how trainers, workflow educators, and operational leads were already managing alignment and drift in real systems, and how Meaning System Science finally provided the structure that made their work a coherent profession.
Agnes Martin, The Islands, 1979.
© The Estate of Agnes Martin / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. Courtesy of the Estate of Agnes Martin.
Featured with The Restoration of Meaning as visual metaphor for humility and restoration: reflection rendered in stillness, structure refined until it becomes peace.
Monograph B3
The Restoration of Meaning
October 2025
Restoration examines the cultural moment we’re living in, one defined by acceleration, fragmentation, and AI-amplified noise. It argues that meaning no longer stabilizes on its own and must now be rebuilt with intention. This paper explains why coherence is a structural necessity for modern systems and why the science had to emerge now.
If the Papers Feel Like a Lot, That’s Okay.
They define the system.
The 3E Standard™ teaches you how to run it.
Legitimacy is not Argued. It is Practiced.
Legitimacy is not Argued. It is Practiced.
Monograph A4
The Physics of Becoming
October 2025
The Physics of Becoming introduces the First Law of Moral Proportion: the equation that determines whether a system can change without losing integrity. While Meaning System Science describes how meaning behaves, this paper explains the physics of transformation itself.
This law is the foundation of Transformation Science and the basis for all diagnostic and applied tools that follow.
Andreas Nicolas Fischer, Thermal Field No. 1, 2019. © Andreas Nicolas Fischer. Courtesy of the artist. Featured with The Legitimacy Diagnostic Protocol as a visual metaphor for proportion and endurance: fields converging in equilibrium, pressure contained until it becomes form.
Technical Monograph C1
The Legitimacy Diagnostic Protocol™ (LDP-1.0)
A Scientific Framework for Measuring Organizational Coherence
October 2025
LDP-1.0 turns the First Law of Moral Proportion into a practical measurement tool. It shows how to quantify truth integrity, power alignment, structural coherence, and drift using real organizational data. This paper provides leaders with a systematic way to see where meaning is being strengthened, and where it is being lost.
Donald Judd, Untitled (Stack), 1967
© Judd Foundation / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York.
Featured with Proportionism as a visual metaphor for relational order: stability created through repeated ratio, structural coherence emerging from calibrated spacing and consistent proportion.
Monograph A5
Proportionism: The Epistemic Stance of Meaning Systems Science
October 2025
Proportionism clarifies how to read the sciences of meaning as one integrated system. It explains the stance needed to see truth, power, structure, and drift in proper relationship. This paper helps leaders and practitioners understand meaning not as intuition but as a proportional pattern that can be interpreted with clarity.
Essential Reading
-
The Semantic Conception of Truth
Alfred Tarski (1944)
Tarski established truth as a formal, verifiable relation, creating the scientific foundation for Truth Fidelity (T) in Meaning System Science. His work anchors meaning in structural accuracy rather than belief or intention.
-
Under Cybernetics
Norbert Wiener (1948)
Wiener’s theory of cybernetics revealed how feedback, signaling, and structural pathways regulate system behavior. His insights form the basis of Signal Alignment (P) and Structural Coherence (C) in MSS.
-
Under The End of Certainty
Ilya Prigogine (1997)
Prigogine’s work on complexity and irreversibility explains why systems destabilize under sustained load. His thermodynamic framework informs the MSS concept of Drift (D) and the dynamics behind systemic reorganization.
-
How Emotions Are Made
Lisa Feldman Barrett (2017)
Barrett’s theory of constructed emotion reframed affect as a primary driver of interpretation. Her work established that regulatory capacity shapes what information can be understood under varying conditions. This insight forms the basis of Affective Regulation (A) in Meaning System Science.
Njideka Akunyili Crosby, The Beautyful Ones, 2012.
© Njideka Akunyili Crosby. Courtesy of the artist and Victoria Miro.
Featured with The General Theory of Interpretation as a visual parallel to layered meaning-systems: a human figure situated within overlapping signals, contexts, and structural cues. The work reflects how interpretation emerges from multiple interdependent environments, unified through a consistent underlying architecture.
Monograph A6
The General Theory of Interpretation
October 2025
This monograph formalizes Meaning System Science as the General Theory of Interpretation. It explains why the variables and system dynamics described in the A-Series constitute a unified scientific account of how interpretive behavior works across human, organizational, and artificial environments. The paper clarifies the historical gap, the structural criteria for general theories, and the implications for research, governance, and applied practice.
Further Study
The Research Library presents the foundational literature of Meaning System Science. If you would like to be informed when new research is released, including our forthcoming 2026 publication, The Math of Meaning, you may join the Institute. Membership adds you to the notification list for future papers, updates, and open releases in the discipline.
